As Cameroon’s Anglophone crisis enters its ninth year, the dynamics are rapidly changing. This time, Ambazonian separatist Dr Ivo Tanku Tapang has filed a defamation lawsuit against U.S.-based Cameroonian attorney Emmanuel Nsahlai. The case, Tapang v. Nsahlai, was initiated on March 2, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Tapang is seeking $100,000 in damages, alleging that Nsahlai falsely accused him of terrorism, material support for violence, and immigration fraud, causing reputational harm and emotional distress.
This is not the first legal battle between the two. In 2018, Nsahlai filed a similar lawsuit against Tapang, which was dismissed in 2021 due to the plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. The new defamation case revives tensions between the two figures, both of whom have played controversial roles in the Anglophone crisis in Cameroon.
Tapang: Activist or Extremist?
Dr. Tapang initially gained recognition for advocating Anglophone rights in Cameroon but has faced criticism for escalating violence through social media rhetoric. While he insists his activism is peaceful and centred on human rights, available evidence suggests otherwise. Some argue that Tapang’s influence and rhetoric around kidnappings for ransom and school boycotts have fuelled conflict rather than facilitated dialogue.
Nsahlai: Legal Advocate or Government Ally?
Emmanuel Nsahlai has actively pursued legal action against Anglophone separatists, arguing that their activities endanger U.S. national security. The recent letter which Tapang is citing, is one in which he wrote to the Department of Homeland Security, providing a long list of Ambazonia separatists whom he alleged had committed crimes in the USA. However, critics accuse him of targeting activists while ignoring human rights violations by government forces. This raises questions about his impartiality and possible ties to the Cameroonian government. For instance, many would have expected Nsahlai to take action or condemn cases such as the Ngarhuh Massacre or the recent massacre of civilians in Pinyin. However, his silence on government atrocities cast doubts on his main objectives.
The Case of Ayaba Cho Lucas
Tapang’s lawsuit against Nsahlai comes at a very crucial time in the history of the Anglophone conflict. This represents a larger pattern of legal actions involving prominent Ambazonian leaders in the diaspora. Many Ambazonians have been imprisoned in the USA for their roles in the conflict. However, the most recent case of Ayaba Cho Lucas, a close associate of Tapang and a key figure in the separatist movement stands out. Ayaba Cho Lucas, leader of the Ambazonia Governing Council (AgovC), is currently facing trial in Norway for incitement to commit crimes against humanity. Arrested in September 2024, Ayaba has been consistently denied bail as Norwegian authorities consider the charges serious. Tapang was at one point, the spokesperson for the AgovC.
There has also been a lot of debate surrounding Ayaba Cho’s detention. While some view it as a politically motivated crackdown, others see it as a necessary step towards accountability. Given his past collaboration with Tapang, Ayaba’s legal troubles could have a role to play in the current defamation suit.
Community and Legal Reactions
The Ambazonian community has largely condemned Nsahlai’s actions, seeing them as attempts to suppress legitimate activism. Others argue that accountability must apply to all parties involved in the crisis. Legal analysts note that this case, alongside Ayaba’s trial, could set a precedent for how defamation and incitement charges are handled within activist circles.
If Tapang wins, it could discourage baseless allegations against activists. However, a ruling in Nsahlai’s favour might embolden further legal actions against individuals engaged in the Anglophone struggle. Similarly, Ayaba’s case in Norway could influence how the international community treats Ambazonian leaders in exile.
This case remains ongoing, and updates may follow as new developments emerge.
